Elsevier

Sleep Medicine Reviews

Volume 32, April 2017, Pages 4-27
Sleep Medicine Reviews

Clinical review
Parent-child bed-sharing: The good, the bad, and the burden of evidence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2016.03.003Get rights and content

Summary

The practice of parent and child sharing a sleeping surface, or ‘bed-sharing’, is one of the most controversial topics in parenting research. The lay literature has popularized and polarized this debate, offering on one hand claims of dangers, and on the other, of benefits – both physical and psychological – associated with bed-sharing. To address the scientific evidence behind such claims, we systematically reviewed 659 published papers (peer-reviewed, editorial pieces, and commentaries) on the topic of parent-child bed-sharing. Our review offers a narrative walkthrough of the many subdomains of bed-sharing research, including its many correlates (e.g., socioeconomic and cultural factors) and purported risks or outcomes (e.g., sudden infant death syndrome, sleep problems). We found general design limitations and a lack of convincing evidence in the literature, which preclude making strong generalizations. A heat-map based on 98 eligible studies aids the reader to visualize world-wide prevalence in bed-sharing and highlights the need for further research in societies where bed-sharing is the norm. We urge for multiple subfields – anthropology, psychology/psychiatry, and pediatrics – to come together with the aim of understanding infant sleep and how nightly proximity to the parents influences children's social, emotional, and physical development.

Section snippets

Child sleep practices

To bed-share or not to bed-share? This seemingly innocuous question has been labeled the ‘single most controversial topic related to pediatric sleep’ [1]. Bed-sharing (the practice of parent and child sharing a sleeping surface) and co-sleeping (shared sleep that includes room-sharing, bed-sharing, and everything in between) are hotly debated. The literature is often polarized, filled with interesting questions, creative designs, and ultimately, insufficient evidence.

Historically, humans have

Aims and method of the study

Following the taxonomy proposed by Cooper [10], this review is designed to exhaustively outline the research findings and associated debate on the topic of bed-sharing. Our goals are twofold: 1) to integrate the past literature, and 2) to identify central issues in the literature. The thorough and systematic review enabled us to create a world-wide ‘heat map’ (chloropleth) of bed-sharing prevalence. The review is organized thematically, grouping studies relating to the same idea and aiming for

Prevalence of bed-sharing around the world

To present the prevalence of bed-sharing practices around the globe, all studies were scrutinized for reported frequencies of bed-sharing. We used the following decision rules: we included only studies reporting prevalence rates for population-based (rather than clinical or high-risk) samples. For population-wide intervention studies, we considered the post-intervention sample prevalence rate, which was thought to provide the most recent stable estimate. If the intervention was applied to a

Reactive versus intentional bed-sharing

A cross-cultural study indicated that bed-sharing rates (higher for predominantly Asian countries than predominantly Caucasian countries) are stable during preschool years, suggesting little change over this period once bed-sharing becomes established [15]. However, parents bed-share for many reasons. Aside from tradition, reasons to bed-share include breastfeeding facilitation, infant irritability or illness, parental ideology, parental own sleep experiences, convenience, anxiety, child

‘Consequences’ and ‘Risks’ of bed-sharing

In the following paragraphs, we discuss associations between bed-sharing and multiple dimensions of child development. For the same reasons bed-sharing prevalence is difficult to establish – e.g., rates vary across cultures and socioeconomic clusters – it is also challenging to establish the relation between bed-sharing and many of the purportedly related risks or benefits.

Discussion

Following an exhaustive narrative review of 659 studies addressing bed-sharing, we note a rather disproportionate emphasis in the literature on the pathological, abnormal, and worrisome dimensions of bed-sharing. As a relatively new cultural phenomenon, the practice of putting infants to sleep in a separate surface has come to dominate the literature as the normal and correct strategy for infant sleep. The reviewed literature has many common themes that warn of dangers for bed-sharing parents –

Conclusion

If the reviewed literature is to be any indication, the debate surrounding bed-sharing is not likely to disappear. An increasing number of studies alleging SIDS risk in bed-sharing infants does not equate to a simple majority-wins vote-count, particularly if publication bias and methodological flaws restrict the clarity of the evidence. Much of the world bed-shares and appears to do so without great risks. Similarly, stating the ‘naturalness’ of a practice does not alleviate the stress that

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Marit Spillenaar Bilgen, Nora Abdulgani Naji, and Afza Iqbal to the data collection. We also would like to thank Marinus van IJzendoorn and Henning Tiemeier for critical evaluation of the manuscript. The present study was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO): an NWO RUBICON prize no 446-11-023 to VRM-S, and NWO VICI grant no. 453-09-003 to MJB-K. MJB-K was also supported by the Gravitation programme of

References (578)

  • S.D. Buswell et al.

    Parent-infant co-sleeping and its relationship to breastfeeding

    J Pediatr Health Care

    (2007)
  • C.W. DeLeon et al.

    Intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with night waking in 9-month-old infants

    Infant Behav Dev

    (2007)
  • I.S. Santos et al.

    Bed-sharing at 3 months and breast-feeding at 1 year in southern Brazil

    J Pediatr

    (2009)
  • J.R. Galler et al.

    Bed-sharing, breastfeeding and maternal moods in Barbados

    Infant Behav Dev

    (2006)
  • M.P.C.M. Luijk et al.

    Ethnic differences in prevalence and determinants of mother-child bed-sharing in early childhood

    Sleep Med

    (2013)
  • R. Ferber

    Solve your child's sleep problems: new, revised, and expanded edition

    (2006)
  • J. Owens

    Sleep in children: cross-cultural perspect

    (2004)
  • N.C. Sharts-Hopko

    Co-sleeping

    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs

    (2005)
  • J.J. McKenna et al.

    Mother-infant cosleeping, breastfeeding and sudden infant death syndrome: what biological anthropology has discovered about normal infant sleep and pediatric sleep medicine

    Am J Phys Anthropol

    (2007)
  • B. Thoman

    Co-sleeping, an ancient practice: issues of the past and present, and possibilities for the future

    Sleep Med Rev

    (2006)
  • B. Alm

    To co-sleep or not to sleep?

    Acta Paediatr

    (2007)
  • T.S. Weisner

    Culture, development, and diversity: expectable pluralism, conflict, and similarity

    Ethos

    (2009)
  • S.R. Valentin

    Commentary: sleep in German infants–the “cult” of independence

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • S.S. Mosko et al.

    Parent-infant cosleeping: the appropriate context for the study of infant sleep and implications for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) research

    J Behav Med

    (1993)
  • H. Cooper

    Editorial

    Psychol Bull

    (2003)
  • M. Arnestad et al.

    Changes in the epidemiological pattern of sudden infant death syndrome in southeast Norway, 1984-1998: implications for future prevention and research

    Arch Dis Child

    (2001)
  • H.L. Ball

    Reasons to bed-share: why parents sleep with their infants

    J Reprod Infant Psychol

    (2002)
  • L. Hutchison et al.

    SIDS-protective infant care practices among Auckland, New Zealand mothers

    N Z Med J

    (2006)
  • M. Glover et al.

    Barriers to best outcomes in breastfeeding for Maori: mothers' perceptions, whanau perceptions, and services

    J Hum Lact

    (2009)
  • L. Tikotzky et al.

    “Ghosts in the Nursery:” infant sleep and sleep-related cognitions of parents raised under communal sleeping arrangements

    Infant Ment Health J

    (2010)
  • G.R. Germo et al.

    Child sleep arrangements and family life: perspectives from mothers and fathers

    (2007)
  • J.J. Doering

    The physical and social environment of sleep in socioeconomically disadvantaged postpartum women

    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs

    (2012)
  • R.P. Oden et al.

    Factors influencing African American mothers' decisions about sleep position: a qualitative study

    J Natl Med Assoc

    (2010)
  • W. Roncolato et al.

    Facilitators and regulators: antenatal maternal orientation and postnatal parenting practices

    J Reprod Infant Psychol

    (2014)
  • L.E. Volpe et al.

    Infant sleep-related deaths: why do parents take risks?

    Arch Dis Child

    (2015)
  • A.J. Fowler et al.

    Safe sleep practices and sudden infant death syndrome risk reduction: NICU and well-baby nursery graduates

    Clin Pediatr (Phila)

    (2013)
  • S. Jain et al.

    Bed sharing in school-age children–clinical and social implications

    J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs

    (2011)
  • N. Taylor et al.

    Consistency in infant sleeping arrangements and mother-infant interaction

    Infant Ment Health J

    (2008)
  • E. Hooker et al.

    Sleeping like a baby: attitudes and experiences of bedsharing in northeast England

    Med Anthropol

    (2001)
  • H.L. Ball et al.

    Where will the baby sleep? Attitudes and practices of new and experienced parents regarding cosleeping with their new-born infants

    Am Anthropol

    (1999)
  • K.P. Tully et al.

    The relationship between planned and reported Home infant sleep locations among mothers of late preterm and term infants

    Matern Child Health J

    (2015)
  • F.R. Hauck et al.

    Evaluation of bedtime basics for babies: a national crib distribution program to reduce the risk of sleep-related sudden infant deaths

    J Community Health

    (2015)
  • K. Connell-Carrick

    Trends in popular parenting books and the need for parental critical thinking

    Child Welf

    (2006)
  • W.-H. Chou

    Co-sleeping and the importation of picture books about bedtime

    Child Lit Educ

    (2008)
  • B.L. Joyner et al.

    Infant sleep environments depicted in magazines targeted to women of childbearing age

    Pediatrics

    (2009)
  • K.D. Ramos et al.

    Parenting advice books about child sleep: cosleeping and crying it out

    Sleep

    (2006)
  • N. Lee

    Observations based upon multiple telephone contacts with new breastfeeding mothers

    J Hum Lact

    (1997)
  • K.D. Gribble

    A model for caregiving of adopted children after institutionalization

    J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs

    (2007)
  • B.A. Hotelling et al.

    Styles of parenting

    (2004)
  • K.E. Green et al.

    Attachment parenting: an exploration of demographics and practices

    Early Child Dev Care

    (2008)
  • Cited by (126)

    • Health Disparities in Pediatric Sleep

      2023, Sleep Medicine Clinics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The most important references are denoted by an asterisk.

    View full text