Daytime sleepiness and its evaluation

Abstract 

Basic models of sleepiness, focusing on the homeostatic and circadian components of sleepiness, are able to predict important fluctuations of sleepiness. However, they fail in explaining certain sleepiness phenomena, as for instance in insomnia patients. To meet this shortcoming, modern models incorporate the arousal component of sleepiness, in addition to the sleep drive. While these models mainly concentrate on short-term changes in sleepiness, “state” sleepiness, there are indications that a stable characteristic level of sleepiness, “trait” sleepiness, is also an important determinant of a person's level of sleepiness. This leads to a conceptualization of sleepiness in which situational factors modify a basal level of sleep drive and arousal. It implies that sleepiness is not a unitary concept and can reflect essentially different states. Multiple sleepiness assessment tools have been proposed in the past. The majority of them offer valuable information, but they do not grasp all aspects of sleepiness. We should bear in mind that tools for assessing sleepiness are always operationalizations reflecting the theoretical framework the investigator has on sleepiness. Hence, rather than searching for a gold standard for the measurement of sleepiness, future research effort should be aimed at linking the various measurement techniques with the hypothesized underlying components of sleepiness on a sound empirical basis. 2002 Harcourt Publishers Ltd

Keywords: sleepiness, somnolence, wakefulness, attention, evaluation, measurement, conceptualization

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

• f1 Correspondence should be addressed to: Raymond Cluydts, PhD, Department of Cognitive and Physiological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium. Tel: ++32 (0) 2 629 25 29; Fax: ++32 (0) 2 629 24 89;E-mail: raymond.cluydts@vub.ac.be