Sleep Medicine Reviews
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 33-46, February 2001

Medico-legal aspects of sleep disorders: sleepiness and civil liability

  • Elizabeth Ellis

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Ronald R Grunstein

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Respiratory Failure and Sleep Disorders and Sleep Research Group, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd Camperdown, Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Received, accepted

Abstract 

Excessive sleepiness is associated with motor vehicle accidents and is responsible for enormous social and financial loss. The specific legal obligations for an individual with a sleep disorder, their employer and those health care practitioners associated with that individual are reviewed. Although there are related implications within the criminal law and in particular criminal negligence, the arguments developed in this paper will be largely confined to the context of the civil liability. The legal concepts of foreseeability and proximity are discussed in the context of sleep-related accidents. The reasoning of a recent Australian High Court judgement is discussed in view of the differences in legal and medical opinion on the extent of foreseeability of accidents as a result of sleepiness. Many countries have legislation designed to protect employees from injury at work and to protect the general public from injury. What is not clear is the extent to which an employer will be required to accept liability for an employee's sleepiness and the duty to monitor the health of their employees. Factors which influence this liability include: the extent to which the implications of the condition is known and understood generally; the extent to which the condition is suspected or identified in an individual employee; the extent of a proper screening and treatment program and the way in which risk management programs have been implemented. Although the issue of sleepiness and civil liability is examined from an Australian legal context, the principles have direct relevance to other legal systems. The authors highlight the degree of uncertainty provided by the common law and statutory provisions, and that decisions rest on the balance of public interests, which mean that many of the current dilemmas facing practitioners may only be solved in the courts.

Keywords: excessive daytime sleepiness, foreseeability, motor vehicle accidents, liability, duty of care

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Correspondence should be addressed to: E. Ellis, Faculty of Health Sciences, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia.

PII: S1087-0792(00)90132-1

doi:10.1053/smrv.2000.0132

Sleep Medicine Reviews
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 33-46, February 2001